NEW COLLECTIVE QUANTIFIED GOALS - ENVIRONMENT

News: What is the New Collective Quantified Goal?

 

What's in the news?

       The recently concluded Bonn climate conference in Germany, expected to outline the political agenda for the crucial end-of-year Conference of Parties 28 (COP28) in Dubai, was critical for reviewing and reforming the climate finance architecture.

 

Key takeaways:

       The conference has exposed a gaping hole in the funding needed to pay for climate action.

       This comes from a long-standing impasse between developed and developing countries, over where money for climate change policies should come from and in what form.

 

New Collective Quantified Goal:

Why NCQG?

       A commitment of $100 billion per year till 2020 to developing nations from developed countries was a target set at the Conference of Parties (COP) in 2009.

       But estimates since then show addressing climate change may cost billions, and even trillions of dollars.

 

Aim:

       To strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change in the context of sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty.

       Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development.

 

Elements of NCQG:

Parties agreed that deliberations on the NCQG be set up around the following elements:

       Ad hoc work programme

       Submissions by Parties and non-Party stakeholders

       High-level ministerial dialogues

       Stock-takes and guidance by the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement (CMA).

 

Features:

       The New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on climate finance is expected to be finalised by 2024.

       It will replace the current climate finance goal of $100 billion annually from developed countries.

       It is to be facilitated by two co-chairs, one from a developed country and one from a developing country.

       It pulls up the ceiling on commitment from developed countries, is supposed to anchor the evolving needs and priorities of developing countries based on scientific evidence and should respond "to the ever-increasing sums of funding necessary for Loss and Damage in response to failed and/or delayed financial support".