UN REFORMS – INTERNATIONAL

News: Angry with reform delays, India calls U.N. system ‘anachronistic’

 

What's in the news?

       The long-simmering debate over UN reform — and particularly over the role of the Security Council, which does not represent today’s world and which failed to prevent Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — has suddenly become acute.

 

UN Charter:

       The Charter was signed in San Francisco on June 26, 1945 and came into force on October 24, 1945.

       It is the foundational treaty of the United Nations.

 

Objectives:

       Conceived above all as a means to save future generations from the scourge of war, the Charter calls for the organization to maintain international peace and security; promote social progress and better standards of life; strengthen international law; and promote human rights.

       As a charter, it is a constituent treaty, and all members are bound by its articles. Article 103 of the Charter states that obligations to the United Nations prevail over all other treaty obligations.

 

The four main goals of the UN include:

       Maintaining international peace and security.

       Developing friendly relations among nations.

       Achieving international cooperation in solving international problems.

       Being at the center for harmonising the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.

 

Issues:

       Veto powers: The United Nations conferred disproportionate power on the five permanent, veto-wielding members of the Security Council. This allows them to protect their own interests while keeping a heavy hand in world affairs.

       The veto power guarantees that permanent members can never be removed from the Council, since the UN Charter’s Article 6 allows the General Assembly to exclude a member only upon the recommendation of the Security Council.

       Lack of international balance among Security Council members: no African or Latin American country holds a permanent seat.

       The General Assembly has always been very much divided. Among the 193 countries, there are five negotiating groups and they are neutralizing each other.

       The functioning of the General Assembly is as important as the permanent members of the UNSC in ensuring reform of the United Nations system.

       The permanent members were “historically not enthusiastic” about reform of the UN system but they have all agreed that it is necessary for introducing changes in the Security Council.

 

Reforms suggested:

       Enlargement of the Security Council: adding both permanent and non-permanent members.

       The veto has to be a bit more disciplined: The point of it should not be “to block progress” but to “force the five permanent members to sit down and arrive at a solution acceptable to all.”

       Limit the use of veto in cases of “mass crimes”.

       Explanation: Any nation casting a veto to explain it before the General Assembly.

 

India’s Role:

       India as the current one of the non-permanent members of the UNSC can start by drafting a resolution containing a comprehensive set of proposals for reforming the UNSC.

       In September 2022, India made a push for UNSC - a meeting of two separate groupings – G-4 and L-69 in New York on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.

       As India leads the Global South, it needs to revitalize its engagement with its traditional partners in the “global south” by articulating their peace and security concerns in the UNSC.

 

Way Forward:

       The Council must be made more representative of developing countries to provide leadership to the entire world.

       Uphold global peace, security, and order: To play a significant and meaningful role, India needs to have a permanent seat at the institution that was built to uphold global peace, security, and order.

       The support from the five Nordic countries and France indicates that these propositions are getting more and more included in the world’s assessment of India.

       China has also previously indicated that it may drop opposition to India joining the UNSC as a permanent member if it calls off cooperation with Japan to get onto the UN high table.

       India must place high hopes in the potential of the non-permanent members in the Council to play the role of constructive peace makers.