HUL DIWAS - MODERN HISTORY

News: Hul Diwas: Remembering the Santal rebellion against the British

 

What's in the news?

       Prime Minister Narendra Modi tweeted about Hul Diwas on June 30, remembering the sacrifice of Adivasis in their fight against British colonial authorities.

 

Key takeaways:

       Every year, the state of Jharkhand celebrates June 30 as ‘Hul Diwas’, marking the beginning of the rebellion, even though some historical accounts date it to the first week of July instead.

 

Santhal Rebellion:

       It was an “organised war against colonialism” led by the Santals, standing against the myriad forms of oppression – economic and otherwise – they were subjected to by the British and their collaborators.

       The Santal rebellion or ‘Hul’ – literally, revolution – began in 1855, two years before the the uprising of 1857, often referred to as “the first war for Indian independence”.

 

Leaders:

       Led by two brothers Sidhu and Kanhu, it saw the participation of as many as 32 caste and communities rallying behind them.

 

Uniqueness:

       The rebellion took place in the lush Damin-i-Koh region – ‘Damin-i-Koh’ meaning the ‘skirts of the hills’ – and took the British by complete surprise.

       This region falls in present-day Jharkhand, more specifically, around the Rajmahal Hills of eastern Jharkhand’s Sahibganj district.

 

Who were the santals?

       Today, the Santal community is the third largest tribal community in India, spread across Jharkhand-Bihar, Odisha and West Bengal.

       The Santal people – or Santalis – were not the original inhabitants of modern day Santhal Pargana – which includes the six districts of Dumka, Pakur, Godda, Sahibganj, Deoghar and parts of Jamtara.

       They had migrated from the Birbhum and Manbhum regions (present-day Bengal), starting around the late 18th century.

       The 1770 famine in Bengal caused the Santals to begin moving and soon, the British turned to them for help.

       With the enactment of the Permanent Settlement Act of 1790, the East India Company was desperate to bring an ever-increasing area in its control under settled agriculture.

       They, thus, chose the area of Damin-i-Koh, at the time heavily forested, to be settled by the Santals, in order to collect a steady stream of revenue.

 

Oppression by Colonial rulers:

       The Santal migration was “forced” by the British merely to collect more revenue.

       Predatory money-lenders and the police were a byproduct of this system.

       Zamindars, the police, the revenue and court alas have exercised a combined system of extortions, oppressive extractions, forcible dispossession of property, abuse and personal violence and a variety of petty tyrannies upon Santhals.

       Usurious interest on loans of money ranging from 50 to 500 percent, false measures at the haut and the market, willful and uncharitable trespass by the rich by means of their untethered cattle, etc.

 

Rebellion:

       By 1854, there was talk of rebellion in tribal councils and meetings. The rebellion finally began after a massive assembly of over 6,000 Santhals representing around 400 villages that took place on June 30, 1855.

       With Sidhu and Kanhu taking the lead, the rebellion saw the mobilization of Santal people across the region, who picked up arms and declared their autonomy from the British.

       Moneylenders and zamindars were executed or forced to flee, and police stations, railway construction sites and dak offices – all symbols of colonial rule – were attacked.

       As per some accounts, approximately 60,000 Santhals took part in this rebellion.

 

Why was the Santhal Rebellion meant to be our pride?

       The evidence of “preparations related to the war such as formation of guerrillas and military teams, appointment of detectives, fixing of secret bases, logistics, network of message carriers for mutual coordination, etc.”  leading to a “deliberate and well planned political war”.

       It was not merely the Santal community which fought but had the participation from 32 communities (tribals and non-tribals both).

       Sisters Phulo-Jhano had led an army of 1,000 women whose jobs included providing food supply, gathering information and also attacked the East Indian camps during the night.

       The East India army was defeated twice during the rebellion. The first was in Pirpainti and the second in Birbhum–all part of lower Bengal then–and the narrative that the East India Company’s army could not be defeated was exposed.