PREVENTIVE DETENTION - POLITY

News: 'Preventive detention es ariary gives power to state'

 

What's in the news?

       The Supreme Court observed in a judgment that preventive detention laws in India are a colonial legacy and confer arbitrary power to the state.

 

Key takeaways:

       A 27-page judgment authored by a Bench led by Justice Krishna Murari de- scribed preventive detention laws as "extremely powerful". The court warned that the prevention detention has an ability to provide the state with unfettered discretion.

       The court said judges should ensure that the government has followed every procedure of law while flexing preventive detention powers against individuals.

 

Preventive detention:

       Preventive detention means detention of a person without trial and conviction by a court.

       The purpose is not to punish a person for a past offence but to prevent him from committing an offence in the near future.

       Thus, preventive detention is only a precautionary measure and based on suspicion.

       Still now, no democratic country in the world has made preventive detention as an integral part of the constitution.

 

Constitutional provision:

       The Article 22 (3) of the Indian constitution provides that if a person is arrested or detained under a law providing for preventive detention, then the protection against arrest and detention under Article 22 (1) and 22 (2) shall not be available.

       The provision is available to both citizens as well as aliens.

       The detention of a person cannot exceed three months unless an advisory board reports sufficient cause for the extended detention. The board is to consist of judges of a high court.

       The grounds of the detention should be communicated to the detenu. However, the facts considered to be against the public interest need not be disclosed.

       The detenu should be afforded an opportunity to make a representation against the detention order.

       The Article 22 also authorises the parliament to prescribe

       the maximum period for which a person is detained in any case under a preventive detention law.

       the procedure to be followed by an advisory board in an inquiry.

       the circumstances and the classes of cases in which a person can be detained for more than three months under a preventive detention law without obtaining the opinion of an advisory board.

       The 44th Amendment Act of 1978 has reduced the period of detention without obtaining the opinion of an advisory board from three to two months.

       However, this provision has not yet been brought into force, hence, the original period of three months still continues.

 

Grounds for preventive detention:

Parliament:

            The Parliament has exclusive authority to make law of preventive detention for reasons connected with

       Defence

       Foreign affairs

       Security of India.

 

Both Parliament and State legislature:

             Both the parliament and state legislatures can concurrently make a law of preventive detention for reasons connected with

       Security of a state

       Maintenance of public order

       Maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community.